Job: Orientation Diagnostics

A new job in CryoSPARC v4.4+ to diagnose the presence of preferred orientation

Description

Orientation Diagnostics is a job (new in CryoSPARC v4.4, updated in v4.5) that can aid in diagnosing the presence of preferred orientation. It includes and builds upon 3DFSC (Tan et al., 2017) and Fourier Sampling (Baldwin & Lyumkis, 2020).

By default, Orientation Diagnostics reports the conical FSC area ratio, or cFAR (v4.4+) and Relative signal (v4.5+). cFAR values below 0.5 generally indicate the presence of preferred orientation. cFAR accounts for both the viewing direction distribution and the signal content present within each particle by quantifying the variance of directional half-map Fourier correlations across the viewing sphere.

Relative signal captures FSC variation as a function of viewing direction. Regions of low relative signal can help identify missing views whose absence has a deleterious effect on map anisotropy.

If particles are supplied, the job will also report the Sampling Compensation Factor or SCF* (Baldwin & Lyumkis, 2020 — see below for more information about the significance of the star). SCF* values below 0.81 generally indicate the presence of preferred orientation. SCF* characterizes the sampling of Fourier shells by considering the viewing directions of all particles, without accounting for the signal content contained therein. A junk particle is given equal weight to a real particle.

We provide a short summary of the two metrics below. Please see the detailed definitions at the end of this job guide or the Orientation Diagnostics tutorial for more information.

cFAR and SCF* at a glance...

	Range	Anisotropy Threshold	A function of…
cFAR	[0, 1] higher is better	0.5	alignments & particle images
SCF*	[0, 1] higher is better	0.81	alignments only

cFAR	SCF*	Conclusion
↑	↑	No orientation bias
↑	↓	? (inconclusive, perhaps a pathological alignment distribution)
↓	↑	Anisotropy due to junk or other contaminants
↓	↓	Anisotropy due to junk and/or preferred orientation

Input

• Volume or Volumes (all classes)

  • New in v4.5: If Volumes (all classes) are supplied from an upstream classification job, orientation diagnostics will be computed for each class volume. Note that this input is a volumes group input.

• [Optional] Particles

  • If supplied, Fourier sampling (and its associated metric, SCF*) will be computed along with other per-particle diagnostics

• [Optional] Mask

  • If supplied, half-maps will be masked prior to the computation of conical FSCs

NOTE: The cFSC plot produced during the final iteration of all refinement jobs uses the auto-tightened mask (mask_fsc_auto). This mask is a low-level output of all refinements and will be automatically used by Orientation Diagnostics:

• when connecting a refined volume group as an input to Orientation Diagnostics

• when using the 'Build Orientation Diagnostics' quick action

To use a custom mask, connect the input mask group. Note that if a custom mask is connected, the results may differ from the output of an upstream refinement.

Common Parameters

Conical FSC

• Number of Directions

  • The conical FSC Area Ratio (cFAR) metric is relatively robust to number of conical axis directions. However, reducing this number can speed up the job for volumes with large box sizes. Increasing this number will create denser spherical plots.

Sampling Compensation Factor

• Symmetry

  • Particle viewing directions will be expanded to account for symmetry. This parameter should be set to the symmetry applied in the upstream refinement.

Output

• 3DFSC volume

  • A volume of radial cFSC curves interpolated at each 3D voxel location

Common Next Steps

• Particle picking (to find missing views)

More details about cFAR, SCF*, and Relative Signal

cFSC Weighted Area-under-Curve (wAuC)

Given a conical Fourier shell correlation, $C_r (\hat{v})$, (where $r$ is the Fourier radius in wave number and $\hat{v}$ is the conical axis), we define the wAuC as

In this weighted sum, the Fourier radius, $r$, ranges from the DC component to the radius at which $C_r(\hat{v})$ first crosses 0.143. Intuitively, for each Fourier radius $r$, the correlation between the half maps is multiplied by the surface area of the Fourier shell at $r$. The final result is proportional to the ‘mass’ of the cone in units of correlation.

cFSC Area Ratio (cFAR)

We define the cFSC as the ratio of the minimum to the maximum $\text{wAuC}(\hat{v})$ over $\hat{v}$, or

$\text{cFAR} \overset{\Delta}{=} \frac{\min_{\hat{v}} \text{wAuC}(\hat{v})}{\max_{\hat{v}} \text{wAuC}(\hat{v})}.$

Sampling Compensation Factor (SCF*) (Baldwin and Lyumkis, 2020)

SCF* measures orientation bias in particle viewing directions — it allows CryoSPARC to convert a potentially difficult-to-parse viewing distribution into a single metric.

SCF* is computed from the statistics of ‘Fourier sampling’. Given a single particle, Fourier sampling is a binary function that indicates which ‘slab’ (i.e., a stack of slices) of Fourier voxels are affected when the particle is used in back-projection. Summing this sampling over many particles allows one to see if large chunks of Fourier space are poorly sampled or missing completely. The degree to which this occurs is measured by the Sampling Compensation Factor—a single number that quantifies the extent to which anisotropic viewing direction distributions attenuate the global FSC value.

Mathematical Definition (expandable section)

To compute the SCF, we consider the sampling of Fourier bins at a particular radius, $R$. In total there are ~$2 \pi R^2$ unique bins in Fourier space. For each particle viewing direction $\hat{v}$, we compute its associated sampling via the slab condition (Baldwin and Lyumkis, 2020):

$\text{Sp}(\hat{k}, \hat{v}, R) \overset{\Delta}{=} \boldsymbol{1} ( \hat{k} \cdot \hat{v}\leq \frac{1}{2 R} ),$

where $\hat{k}$ is a unit vector that defines a Fourier voxel on the shell of radius $R$, and $\boldsymbol{1}(\cdot)$ is the indicator function. Intuitively, this function returns 1 for all Fourier voxels that belong to a ring of radius $R$, within a plane orthogonal to $\hat{v}$ (and 0 otherwise). Next, we sum $\text{Sp}(\hat{k}, \hat{v}, R)$ for all particle viewing directions to produce $\text{Sp}$, a single set of values that indicate the number of times each bin was sampled. The SCF can then be computed as

$\text{SCF} = \left( <\text{Sp}> <\frac{1}{\text{Sp}}> \right)^{-1},$

where $\frac{1}{\text{SP}}$ denotes element-wise reciprocals, and $<\cdot>$ is the arithmetic mean. This value is positive and always less than or equal to 1. Higher numbers indicate more uniform sampling distributions. If there are zeros amongst the sampling set, the above will be not defined. To account for this potential we report

$\text{SCF*} = \left(\frac{<\text{Sp}^*>}{p} \left(p <\frac{1}{\text{Sp}^*}> + q \right) \right)^{-1},$

where $q$ is the fraction of zero sampling bins, $p = 1 - q$, and $\text{Sp}^*$ are the non-zero sampling values. Note that if $q=0$, then $\text{SCF} = \text{SCF*}$. Please refer to (Baldwin and Lyumkis, 2021) for more details.

Relative Signal

The conical sections used to compute cFSCs cannot be easily mapped to viewing directions. To map FSC values to viewing directions, we use a toroidal section. We define a toroidal section to be the volume swept out by a cone, whose axis is orthogonal to the viewing direction, as it spins about the viewing direction. A toroidal section contains the Fourier components that would be populated by a particle with the same viewing direction, dilated to account for some error (or 'wiggle') in the pose estimate. We set the toroidal half-angle such that its volume is approximately equal to a cone of the same half-angle.

Conical vs. toroidal sections and their relation to the Fourier Slice Theorem.

Using these toroidal sections, we compute a set of FSC curves. This set then allows to define a number, which we call relative signal, for each viewing direction. Relative signal is the wAuC of each curve, normalized with respect to the maximum within the set. The curve with the greatest wAuC in the set has a relative signal of 1.0, while a theoretical curve with a wAuC that is 0 at every frequency would have a relative signal of 0.0.

FSC curves computed within a toroidal section. Each curve is coloured by its relative signal, which we define to be the wAuC of each curve, normalized with respect to the maximum. We visualize each curve as a single number on an azimuth-elevation chart, and a 3D viewing sphere that encompasses a low-pass-filtered 3D volume.

Plot Explanations

v4.4 only plots

cFSC wAuC vs. conical axis

The wAuC of a cFSC curve is a proxy for directional signal content. If wAuC is relatively constant when the conical axis is varied, then the signal is isotropic in viewing direction. This plot helps illustrate the variation in cFSC wAuC and can aid in diagnosing the ‘structure’ of anisotropy.

cFSC resolution vs. conical axis

This plot is similar to the plot above, but visualizes the 0.143 crossing, rather than wAuC, of each cFSC curve.

cFSC summaries within azimuth/elevation regions

To add back in a coarse notion of directionality to the above plot, we reproduce the same statistics for twelve different regions of axis space. This plot can help identify differences in cFSC variance to further elucidate the source of anisotropy.

Summary of cFSC curves

Updated in v4.5. We summarize all cFSC curves in this plot, visualizing statistics as a function of spatial frequency rather than conical axis. As of v4.5, this plot also displays the cFAR score.

In blue: statistics over cFSC curves: mean, min, max, +/- one standard deviation plotted against spatial frequency. In green: histogram over 0.143 crossings of the same curves.

Relative signal

New in v4.5. Relative signal visualized in a 2D azimuth-elevation chart (left), and in a 3D coloured scatter plot (right) with a low-pass-filtered volume embedded within. Low relative signal (i.e., darker colours) indicates a region with under-represented views.

Relative signal vs. viewing direction (left: azimuth/elevation, right: 3D coloured scatter plot with structure embedded inside).

Relative signal in azimuth / elevation regions

New in v4.5. Relative signal within twelve regions of the viewing sphere, defined by different limits on azimuth and elevation. For each region, we show the projection of the structure from the central viewing direction, as well as the mean relative signal withing that region. Regions with low relative signal represent missing or underrepresented views in the data.

Relative signal within 12 azimuth/elevation regions.

3DFSC volume

The 3DFSC volume (Tan et. al, 2017) is another way to summarize cFSC curves by storing them in a volume whose voxels are interpolated from cFSC values at the nearest conical axis. In this plot, we visualize the 3DFSC volume via central slices. The ‘sphericity’ of the volume (which is output by the job) is a proxy for anisotropy.

Central slices of the 3DFSC volume (Tan et. al, 2017) composed of interpolated cFSC values. This volume can be inspected via Chimera(X).

Fourier Sampling

(Only generated if particles are connected). These plots visualize the Fourier sampling accumulated over a random subset of the particle viewing directions (default: 10000) — Fourier sampling is anti-podally symmetric (and hence only has ~ $2 \pi R^2$ bins) so we visualize only the $z>0$ hemisphere, following the original publication (Baldwin, P. R., & Lyumkis, D., 2020). N.B., the elevation / azimuth plot on the left should be visually similar to the Posterior Precision plot as posterior precision measures Fourier sampling modulated by the CTF.

The Fourier sampling $\text{Sp}$ (see equation in mathematical definition) visualized in 3D (right) and via an azimuth / elevation parameterization of the hemisphere (left).

Particle scale factor vs. viewing direction

(Only generated if particles are connected and per-particle scales are not all 1.0). This figure visualizes the average particle scale for a set of viewing directions (uniformly sampled on the viewing sphere).

(top) particle scale factors visualized by colour as function of particle viewing direction. (bottom) particle scale factor histogram (reproduced in other refinement jobs).

References

Tan et al. (2017), Addressing preferred specimen orientation in single-particle cryo-EM through tilting. Nat Methods 14(8), 793-796.

Baldwin, P. R., & Lyumkis, D. (2020). Non-uniformity of projection distributions attenuates resolution in Cryo-EM. Progress in biophysics and molecular biology 150, 160-183.